Hi to my Forum Friends,

So, is Darwinian Evolution a fact, as our atheist Friends tell us -- or a fallacy, as common sense and the Bible tell us? Obviously many of our Forum Friends are not going to accept the Bible truth; so, I suggest everyone read the article shown below -- written by a non-Christian science journalist.

Below is an excerpt from that article. Read Sean McDowell's article and decide for yourself if your ancestors were ape or human. Mine were human. Common sense tells me this; the Bible tells me this -- and science cannot refute it -- with actual facts. Sure they can give us great theories, wild postulations, phony fossil evidence -- but, no "missing link" fossils. Out of all the millions and millions of fossils found and shown in museums -- no "missing link." Don't you think that even the most pig-headed atheist/evolutionists/secularists would by now just cry "Uncle"?

But, we must keep in mind that our atheist/evolutionists/secularists Friends bear a striking resemblance to that fellow who stands in the middle of the highway with an eighteen wheeler coming toward him while he keeps asking, "What truck?" Then, we have road kill of ape descendants.

FOSSILS: FACT OR FALLACY?
Written by: Sean McDowell
Date: Dec 16th 2008
Link

Science journalist Richard Milton, who is not a Christian, sums up the evidence for ape-to-human evolution from the fossil record: "The position today is that all fossil remains which were previously assigned some intermediate status between apes and humans have later been definitely reassigned into the categories of either extinct ape or human, and this reassignment has been accepted by all but the most fanatical devotees of this or that fossil. . . the missing link is still missing." -- Richard Milton, Shattering the Myths of Darwinism (Rochester, Virginia: Park Street Press, 1997), 199-208.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

You are wrong.

List of a lot of fossils relating to the evolution of homo sapiens , or in short terms "the missing links".

Link

quote:

Originally posted by excelman:
You are wrong.

List of a lot of fossils relating to the evolution of homo sapiens , or in short terms "the missing links".

Hi Excel,

As the author points out: they have found homo sapien fossils; they have found ape fossils -- but, they have not found that "missing link" fossil which definitely shows the transition from ape to man.

Wag all the bones you want; but, you cannot show us one labelled the "Missing Link" Fossil.

Until you can -- it is still just Darwinian Evolutionist smoke.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

They ain't no sich a thang as a "fossil," them there bones is just what got drowned in the big 'un of -4000. Some of 'em is unicorns and behomoths and leviathans and them there giants of old who fornicated with the sons of God in the land of Nod, they was giants, Genesis says so, and all this here man-learning is just stupid! Only one book matters and Jesus wrote it, in old timey English! It got a little help from Moses and such as them profits and all.

Why next thang you know all them there fancy fellers with there colleges and such will be a telling us that Joshua did not make the sun stand still because the earth goes around it! I heard one feller claim it over to the feed store the other day, but I preached at him for a good 10 mins. and he hauled and hit me, said he was a "Piscopal" and we was all full of well, you know what the feller said, and it weren't purty at all! Said he done gone off to college for 9years, so I reckon he must be a brain surgen or sumpthing like that, but Zeke he said he worked at a college and them piscopals was like fancy methodists. Got em big ole organs and sprinkling and such and fancy dresses for there preachers and all and drink whiskey and go play golf and tinis on Sundays after church and like that. Lord! What nonsense! They don't even got no room for gettin saved. How cold they wehn they got Darwin to the brain?

Sprinkling? Did you say sprinkling???


Them boys goin to Haaayyyyullllllllllll!

Ain't no room in Hevven for sprinklers, nosirree. Not in my Hevven, anywhoos.

It says so sumwhurs.


DF

Hi Folks,

Just be patient while our two athest children play.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Interesting that everyone who doesn't like the theory of evolution seems to enjoy tying our origins back to apes. One would think the ape hasn't changed a bit in thousands of years. The actual theory is that they share a common origin in the path of evolution where the end result was homo sapiens or humans for us. No matter how we determine our origin, by creation or evolution, we are classified both as a mammal and within the bipedal primate species. That means we share the same species classification with apes. If we assume the theory of evolution it would lead us to believe the two diverged at some point from a common origin. But that divergence would have been some time ago as our current status is theorized to have emerged 200,000 years ago. I'm not sure what it means with creationism other than maybe God found it necessary to create some commonality in species classifications. But in any case I'll take the route of evolution and no, I didn't evolve from an ape. We share a common origin. (That sentence would actually be true for creationism as well.)

TRUE -- FROM AN EVOLUTIONIST'S POINT OF VIEW, WE ALL COME FROM THE LEMUR!

YET, THE LEMUR IS STILL HERE -- WITH MAN. IF EVERYONE EVOLVED FROM THE LEMUR -- WHY IS HE STILL HERE?

OK, so we aren't going to have a logical discussion. I simply stated a viewpoint and I didn't say we evolved from lemurs. I am thinking that you purposely set a trap for others rather than open a discussion. So be it . . .

quote:

Below is an excerpt from that article. Read Sean McDowell's article and decide for yourself if your ancestors were ape or human.

For anyone that doesn't know: Genetic and fossil and geologic and radiometric and a hundred other sciences all have converging lines of evidence that indicate a single hypothesis: That the last common ancestor of man and ape, Australopithecus Afarensis, lived about 7 million years ago on the grassy savannas of east Africa.

From this single ancestor, the lineage that lead to modern gorillas led one way up the family tree. The lineage that led to man led another.

At least that is what the scientific evidence indicates. The alternative is that a god left this evidence everywhere in order to fool us. Only god knows why He would do such a thing.

quote:

YET, THE LEMUR IS STILL HERE -- WITH MAN. IF EVERYONE EVOLVED FROM THE LEMUR -- WHY IS HE STILL HERE?

going to submit this to Letterman for Top 10 Stupidest Things Ever Said.



DF

The great thing about fossils is putting together the puzzle. I remember all the simple fossils we found around home when I was a kid. Could you imagine being the one to discover some of the big stuff? I would probably break it.

quote:

Originally posted by DeepFat:

quote:

YET, THE LEMUR IS STILL HERE -- WITH MAN. IF EVERYONE EVOLVED FROM THE LEMUR -- WHY IS HE STILL HERE?

going to submit this to Letterman for Top 10 Stupidest Things Ever Said.



DF

Maybe it would help if we eradicate the lemur. We would probably get in trouble with Greenpeace and the animal rights folks. But we wouldn't have to worry about that pesky little creature again. (Is that the correct way to be a smart ***?)

quote:

going to submit this to Letterman for Top 10 Stupidest Things Ever Said.

Here's another: If man came from dirt, why is there still dirt?